I just got around to listening to this week’s Meet the Press podcast with Tim Russert. The special guest this week was Ron Paul. I’ll note that Paul didn’t get the entire hour, like some candidates.
Now I’ve been a fan of most of Ron Paul because he’s the only candidate who truly believes in small government, personal responsibility, and keeping the federal government out of my life as much as possible. All of the other candidates want more involvement in my life, more laws, and less personal liberties.
But anyway, I was pretty disappointed in the Ron Paul interview. Finally in a VERY mainstream show with exposure to millions of Americans, Ron Paul didn’t exactly stand out as the “Hope for America.”
Partly it was the format; Dr. Paul didn’t have much time to present his platform or answer questions.
Partly it was the interviewer. Russert is known for asking hard questions, but it was fairly clear that he went on the attack even moreso with Paul. Maybe he didn’t consider him to be a serious candidate and, therefore, not worth the same opportunities to present his platform. Maybe he is just a biased dick; I really couldn’t tell.
Partly it was that Paul simply didn’t have his shit together. He didn’t know the number of troops he wanted to bring home, he didn’t know how much tax revenue would disappear if the income tax was repealed, and he stumbled through many of the questions.
I was disappointed.
I will say one positive thing, however. Part of the awkwardness of this interview was due to Paul’s ability to think and speak outside the current paradigm of complicated politics and double speak. At one point, Russert accused Paul of not being a strict constructionist because he wanted to amend the constitution to remove the income tax. Russert, used to people who play the game of politics, couldn’t handle Paul’s logic that amending the constitution was PART of the constitution. It was just too simple to understand. For that simplicity, I applaud Ron Paul.
The Texas primary comes around in March. I have fear that, by that time, there will be no Ron Paul to vote for. If he continues with performances like this on the national stage, he won’t have a hope in waking up Americans who are fed up with our current system but, like Russert, can’t understand how simplicity would fix the complex problem.